March, 1925.
Present — Hubbs, P.J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. We are of the opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and also that the Special Term might very properly have declined to assume jurisdiction on the authority of Tracy v. Coyle ( 121 Misc. 526). (See, also, Evans v. Appell, 211 App. Div. 105.)
Full title:MAUDE CODY and Others, Appellants, v. FRANK L. NEID and Others, Respondents
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1925
Counsel for objectant urges that since complete relief can be obtained in such pending Supreme Court action,…
Matter of BauschThe usual rule applicable to situations where two courts have concurrent jurisdiction, namely, that the first…