Summary
In Crenshaw Subway Coalition v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, No. CV 11–9603 FMO, 2015 WL 6150847, at *26 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2015), the court affirmed an agency determination, based on a parking survey, that a light rail project "will not result in a significant impact because the combination of both on- and off-street parking provides enough total parking spaces to meet the demand in the area.
Summary of this case from Japanese Vill., LLC v. Fed. Transit Admin.Opinion
Case No. CV 11-9603 FMO (JCx)
10-14-2015
CRENSHAW SUBWAY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants.
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 23, 2015, IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiff's CEQA claim is dismissed with prejudice. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims between non-diverse parties. Accordingly, the remaining state claims are hereby remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dated this 14th day of October, 2015.
/s/_________
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge