From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 19, 2006
Case No. 06-15024 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 06-15024.

December 19, 2006


AMENDED ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING CROSS-CLAIM


AMENDED ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING CROSS-CLAIM

This case was commenced on November 8, 2006 by several plaintiffs who claim that a recently-approved state constitutional amendment, Proposal 06-2, now known as Article 1, section 26 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, that purports to bar the use of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin to promote diversity in public hiring, contracting, and university admission decisions, violates the United States Constitution. On December 11, 2006, defendants Regents of the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, and the Board of Governors of Wayne State University filed a cross-claim against co-defendant Governor Jennifer Granholm seeking declaratory relief. The University parties also requested a preliminary injunction to delay the implementation of the state constitutional amendment until the current enrollment season is completed. Thereafter, the Michigan Attorney General sought permission to intervene as a defendant in the matter, together with a motion to expedite consideration of the motion to intervene, citing his "duty to defendant the constitutionality" of the ballot initiative. Mot. to Intervene ¶ 13. The parties to the case either took no position or consented to the relief, and the Court granted the motion to intervene on December 14, 2006.

On December 18, 2006, the Court received a stipulation [dkt #26] from all parties to the case, including intervening defendant Michigan Attorney General, consenting to the temporary injunctive relief sought by the cross-claimants (the University defendants), and agreeing to dismiss with prejudice the portion of the cross-claim seeking a temporary injunction, and the balance of the cross-claim without prejudice. The Court finds that the interests of all parties and the public are represented adequately through the state defendants and their various elected representatives, and the Court, therefore, will approve the stipulation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the application of Article 1, section 26 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963 to the current admissions and financial aid policies of defendants Regents of the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, and the Board of Governors of Wayne State University is enjoined from this date through the end of the current admissions and financial aid cycles or until further order of the Court. This injunction shall expire at 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2007, unless it is vacated by the Court before that date.

It is further ORDERED that the portion of the cross-claim by defendants Regents of the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, and the Board of Governors of Wayne State University seeking temporary injunctive relief is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the remaining part of their cross-claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that each party shall bear its own fees and costs.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for preliminary injunction [dkt # 5] is DISMISSED as moot.


Summaries of

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 19, 2006
Case No. 06-15024 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm

Case Details

Full title:COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRATION RIGHTS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 19, 2006

Citations

Case No. 06-15024 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2006)

Citing Cases

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equal. by any Means Necessary(Bamn) v. Regents of the Univ. of Mich.

The district court's order stemmed from a stipulation among the University Defendants, Coalition Plaintiffs,…