From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coake v. Burt

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 19, 2012
2012-MO-056 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

2012-MO-056

12-19-2012

Robert Coake and Susan Coake, Respondents, v. Kathleen Burt, n/k/a Kathleen Thomason, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2011-188246

Harold P. Threlkeld, of Anderson, for Petitioner. James Allbright Blair III and Kirsten Elena Small, both of Nexsen Pruet, of Greenville, for Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Heard December 6, 2012.

Appeal From Anderson County J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Harold P. Threlkeld, of Anderson, for Petitioner.

James Allbright Blair III and Kirsten Elena Small, both of Nexsen Pruet, of Greenville, for Respondents.

PER CURIUM.

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals finding the circuit court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the seller of residential real estate because the issues of the reasonableness of the purchasers' inspection of the real estate prior to closing and the damages incurred from the seller's alleged incomplete or misleading disclosures on the inspection form were questions that should have been resolved by the jury. See Coake v. Burt, 391 S.C. 201, 705 S.E.2d 453 (Ct. App. 2010). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coake v. Burt

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 19, 2012
2012-MO-056 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Coake v. Burt

Case Details

Full title:Robert Coake and Susan Coake, Respondents, v. Kathleen Burt, n/k/a…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

2012-MO-056 (S.C. Dec. 19, 2012)