From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clutchette v. Enomoto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 1976
536 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 71-2357.

June 23, 1976.

William D. Stein, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

William Bennett Turner (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Alfonso J. Zirpoli, Judge.

Before TUTTLE, HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

Honorable Elbert P. Tuttle, Senior Judge, Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.



ORDER


Insofar as our opinions in Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 809, and Clutchette v. Procunier (9th Cir. 1975) 510 F.2d 613, are inconsistent with Enomoto v. Clutchette, sub nom. Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976) ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1551, 47 L.Ed.2d 810, we vacate our prior opinions.

The cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Baxter v. Palmigiano, supra.


Summaries of

Clutchette v. Enomoto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 23, 1976
536 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Clutchette v. Enomoto

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WESLEY CLUTCHETTE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. JERRY J. ENOMOTO ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1976

Citations

536 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Spain v. Procunier

The trial court ordered that unless the appellees were "accorded a properly noticed disciplinary hearing with…

Russell v. Selsky

Russell suggests that Wolff stands for the proposition that once a prison guard acts as a review officer, he…