From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James B. Clow & Sons, Inc. v. Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Second Division
Feb 19, 1963
39 Ill. App. 2d 279 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)

Summary

In James B. Clow Sons, Inc. v. Chesterfield Sewer Water, Inc. (1963), 39 Ill. App.2d 279 (abstract of opinion), the court held that if a person filing a plat is not the owner of the land, the plat is not a statutory plat and is ineffective as a conveyance.

Summary of this case from Kuney v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Opinion

Gen. No. 11,634. (Abstract of Decision.)

February 19, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DuPage County; the Hon. MEL ABRAHAMSON, Judge, presiding. Reversed and remanded.

Jack M. Siegel, Frisch Fox, and Richard F. Moone, all of Chicago, for appellants;

Brown, Fox Blumberg, of Chicago (Nathan S. Blumberg and Thane T. Swartz, of counsel), for Inland Investment Corporation, Richard H. Bamford and Mary E. Bamford, defendants, counterclaimants and appellees.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

James B. Clow & Sons, Inc. v. Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Second Division
Feb 19, 1963
39 Ill. App. 2d 279 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)

In James B. Clow Sons, Inc. v. Chesterfield Sewer Water, Inc. (1963), 39 Ill. App.2d 279 (abstract of opinion), the court held that if a person filing a plat is not the owner of the land, the plat is not a statutory plat and is ineffective as a conveyance.

Summary of this case from Kuney v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Case details for

James B. Clow & Sons, Inc. v. Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James B. Clow Sons, Inc., and Gretna Material Sales Co.…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Second Division

Date published: Feb 19, 1963

Citations

39 Ill. App. 2d 279 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963)
188 N.E.2d 882

Citing Cases

Powell v. R.J. Anderson, Inc.

[2] The purpose of the summary judgment procedure is not to try an issue of fact but to determine whether an…

Kuney v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Plaintiff maintains that because Ropa, Inc., did not own the entire property described in the plat, it could…