From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clouse, Etc. v. Peden

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jan 25, 1962
132 Ind. App. 649 (Ind. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 19,453.

Filed January 25, 1962.

Appeal — Failure To Enter Judgment on Verdict — Suspension of Consideration of Appeal — Rules of Supreme Court. — Appellate Court, exercising its discretion under Rule 2-3 of the Supreme Court, suspends consideration of appeal until trial court disposes of the issues involved in this cause by the entry of an appropriate judgment on the verdict of the jury.

From the Montgomery County Circuit Court, Howard A. Sommer, Judge.

Daniel P. Clouse, Jr., by his next friend, Daniel P. Clouse, Sr., appellant, brought action for damages against appellee, William Peden. Verdict was directed and returned in favor of appellee and appellant appeals.

Consideration of appeal suspended.

John F. Townsend, Earl C. Townsend, Jr., Townsend Townsend, of Indianapolis, and Wernle Ristine, of Crawfordsville, for appellant.

Edgar W. Bayliff, Cook, Cook, Bayliff Mahoney, of Kokomo, John R. Berry and Foley Berry, of Crawfordsville, for appellee.


This is an action for damages instituted in the Montgomery Circuit Court by the appellant against the appellee. Trial was had by a jury and after appellant had submitted his case, appellee moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for appellee. The court sustained this motion and directed the jury to return a verdict for the appellee which verdict the jury duly returned.

Appellant thence filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled by the court. In due course this appeal was perfected.

The transcript discloses no judgment on the verdict even though a motion by appellee so requested. Said transcript is certified as being a true and correct copy of the record, hence we assume no judgment was entered.

The 1958 Revision of the Supreme Court, Rule 2-3 provides:

"No appeal will be dismissed as of right because the case was not finally disposed of in the court below as to all issues and parties, but upon suggestion or discovery of such a situation the appellate tribunal may, in its discretion, suspend consideration until disposition is made of such issue. . . ."

Taking cognizance of this ruling, we, at our discretion, now suspend consideration of this appeal until such time as the Montgomery Circuit Court finally disposes of the issues involved in this cause by the entry of an appropriate judgment on the verdict of the jury.

The Clerk of the Montgomery Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Indiana, is hereby ordered to certify a copy of such judgment when entered, to the Clerk of this Court, and the same is hereby ordered thereupon to become a part of the transcript of the record heretofore filed in this appeal. Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (1960), 130 Ind. App. 18, 168 N.E.2d 74.

Kelley, P.J., Gonas and Pfaff, JJ., concur.

NOTE. — Reported in 179 N.E.2d 586.


Summaries of

Clouse, Etc. v. Peden

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jan 25, 1962
132 Ind. App. 649 (Ind. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

Clouse, Etc. v. Peden

Case Details

Full title:CLOUSE, BY NEXT FRIEND, ETC. v. PEDEN

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Jan 25, 1962

Citations

132 Ind. App. 649 (Ind. Ct. App. 1962)
179 N.E.2d 586

Citing Cases

Clouse, Etc. v. Peden

ACHOR, J. This case comes to us on petition to transfer from the Appellate Court under Acts 1933, ch. 151, §…