From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cline v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Oct 7, 2016
381 P.3d 516 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

involving third-party beneficiary contract claim

Summary of this case from Rigdon v. Flowserve Corp.

Opinion

No. 113,851

10-07-2016

Lonnie Cline and Joe Cline, Appellees, v. Gary Peterson, Appellant.

John Hicks and Samuel Bennett, of Norris & Keplinger, L.L.C., of Overland Park, for appellant. Robert R. Eisenhauer and Daniel O. Lynch, of Johnston, Eisenhauer, Eisenhauer & Lynch, LLC, of Pratt, for appellees.


Reverse.


Summaries of

Cline v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Oct 7, 2016
381 P.3d 516 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

involving third-party beneficiary contract claim

Summary of this case from Rigdon v. Flowserve Corp.

involving third-party beneficiary contract claim

Summary of this case from Grice v. CVR Energy, Inc.

involving third-party beneficiary contract claim

Summary of this case from Collier v. Flowserve Corp.
Case details for

Cline v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:Lonnie Cline and Joe Cline, Appellees, v. Gary Peterson, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Oct 7, 2016

Citations

381 P.3d 516 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Rigdon v. Flowserve Corp.

Indeed, each of those cases involved a breach of contract action, as opposed to a tort action under §324A.…

Grice v. CVR Energy, Inc.

Indeed, each of those cases involved a breach of contract action, as opposed to a tort action under §324A.…