From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Board of Education v. URS Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 17, 1995
72 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Ohio 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2378

Submitted April 4, 1995 —

Decided May 17, 1995.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 64496.

Hahn Loeser Parks, Mark E. Staib and Royce R. Remington, for appellant.


The discretionary appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425. Only that portion of the court of appeals' opinion that finds the indemnification and contribution claims of URS Company to be time barred by R.C. 2305.131 is reversed. The portion of the appellate opinion addressing URS Company's fraud claims is affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Board of Education v. URS Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 17, 1995
72 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Ohio 1995)
Case details for

Board of Education v. URS Co.

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. URS COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 17, 1995

Citations

72 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Ohio 1995)
648 N.E.2d 811

Citing Cases

Education Resources Institute, Inc. v. Piazza

"[U]nder common-law rules matters of procedure are governed by the law of the forum" ( Martin v. Dierck…