From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemons v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 31, 1963
314 F.2d 278 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 17241.

Argued January 2, 1963.

Decided January 31, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc February 15, 1963.

Mr. Charles J. McKerns, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. John B. Jacob, Washington, D.C. (appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Robert A. Levetown, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and Victor W. Caputy, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


Convicted of raping an 80-year-old woman in her apartment, Clemons appeals. He asserts the evidence against him was insufficient, as a matter of law, to go to the jury, and that the prosecuting attorney in his closing argument drew the jury's attention to the fact that he did not take the stand.

The victim was unable to identify her assailant except to the extent of saying he was a light-skinned Negro wearing a red flowered sport shirt and a narrow-brimmed straw hat. But strong circumstantial evidence that Clemons was the attacker amply justified submitting the case to the jury, and fully warranted that body in returning a verdict of guilty as charged.

For example, a baseball ticket stub, admittedly used by appellant earlier in the evening, was found on the floor in the room in which the rape occurred.

In our view, the challenged remarks of the prosecutor did not refer to appellant's failure to testify.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Clemons v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 31, 1963
314 F.2d 278 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Clemons v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Charles CLEMONS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 1963

Citations

314 F.2d 278 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
114 U.S. App. D.C. 273

Citing Cases

United States v. Cary

138 U.S.App.D.C. 349, 354, 427 F.2d 619, 624. See, e. g., Clemons v. United States, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 273, 314…

Calhoun v. United States

" [Footnotes omitted] [ 387 F.2d at 192] While we feel the Thomas case adequately supports our affirmance of…