From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 29, 1974
56 Ala. App. 275 (Ala. Crim. App. 1974)

Summary

In Clemmons, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction which was grounded on a guilty plea because "[h]e was never apprised of the fact that he might be treated as a youthful offender under the statute."

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Alabama

Opinion

3 Div. 272.

October 1, 1974. Rehearing Denied October 29, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Butler County, Arthur E. Gamble, Jr., J.

H. Edward McFerrin, Greenville, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and John M. Gruenewald, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.


Appellant, Jesse Ray Clemmons, was indicted by the grand jury of Butler County, Alabama, on May 9, 1973, for first degree murder. He was found guilty of second degree murder and sentenced to thirty years in the penitentiary.

In our review of the record, we found that Jesse Ray Clemmons, at the time of trial, was twenty years of age and at no time before or during the trial was he ever apprised of the fact that he had the right to request to be considered as a youthful offender.

Under Morgan v. State, 291 Ala. 764, 287 So.2d 914, we must remand this cause to the circuit court to investigate and examine the appellant at a hearing and determine whether in its discretion appellant should be tried as a youthful offender. Title 15, § 266(1), Code of Alabama.

The trial court is further instructed that the hearing be held speedily, and that a full record be made together with the court's determination. A transcript of these proceedings, under the seal of the Clerk, will then be forwarded to this court for review. Seibold v. State, 287 Ala. 549, 253 So.2d 302.

Remanded with directions.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Clemmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 29, 1974
56 Ala. App. 275 (Ala. Crim. App. 1974)

In Clemmons, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction which was grounded on a guilty plea because "[h]e was never apprised of the fact that he might be treated as a youthful offender under the statute."

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Alabama
Case details for

Clemmons v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jesse Ray CLEMMONS v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 29, 1974

Citations

56 Ala. App. 275 (Ala. Crim. App. 1974)
321 So. 2d 237

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

The proper way to challenge on these grounds would also be by a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See…

Gordon v. Nagle

On this appeal the state has not suggested that the testimony of either Gordon or his attorney is not…