From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clement v. Lahood

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1531.

Submitted: August 17, 2010.

Decided: October 7, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01056-CMHIDD).

Audrey Clement, John Reeder, Appellants Pro Se. Allen M. Brabender, Bernard G. Kim, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Dwight Eib, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Audrey Clement and John Reeder appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Government and dismissing Clement's civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Clement and Reeder's motion for a stay pending appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clement v. LaHood, No. 1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD, 2010 WL 1779701 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Clement v. Lahood

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Clement v. Lahood

Case Details

Full title:Audrey CLEMENT; John Reeder, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Joshua Ruebner…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

The Nat'l Ass'n for The Advancement of Colored People Erie Unit 2262 v. Fed. Highway Admin.

This fact has been confirmed by a number of courts that have considered the issue. See, e.g., Clement v.…