Summary
dismissing petition as "second or successive" where Petitioner claimed to be "entitled to a change in his original sentence because of a change in the law"
Summary of this case from Perry v. WoffordOpinion
No. CV 14-6001 JFW (FFM)
10-22-2014
CURTIS LAVELL CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. M.J. BITER, WARDEN, Respondent.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the petition without prejudice. DATED: October 22, 2014
/s/_________
JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge