From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claymont v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1988
140 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 23, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff placed a restraining notice on the proceeds of artwork and other articles consigned for sale by the wife of the defendant judgment debtor. The defendant's wife, in an affidavit, swore that these items were her property obtained prior to her marriage to the judgment debtor. The sole evidence submitted by the plaintiff to support his contention that the consigned property belonged to the defendant was a vague, nonspecific statement in his affidavit that the descriptions of "many" of the articles consigned for sale matched articles he had seen at the defendant's house before the defendant married. This claim did not satisfy the plaintiff's obligation to produce evidence from which the hearing court could infer that the property sold by the defendant's wife actually belonged to the defendant (see, Matter of New York Credit Men's Assn. v Schneider, 247 App. Div. 896, appeal dismissed 273 N.Y. 625, mot to vacate order of dismissal denied 274 N.Y. 637). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Claymont v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1988
140 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Claymont v. Levitt

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS E. CLAYMONT, Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. LEVITT, Defendant. SIMONE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Perkins

At issue in the former husband's dispute with the third-party creditor, was who had title to the Middle…

F.D.I.C. v. Koffman

Defendants' argument that the account should be exempt from levy because they have no direct or actual…