Summary
stating that New York "allows counterclaims to be raised through separate litigation ... as long as a party defendant does not remain silent in one action, then bring a second suit on the basis of a pre-existing claim for relief that would impair the rights or interests established in the first action"
Summary of this case from Nat'l Air Cargo Grp. v. Maersk Line Ltd.Opinion
May 24, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).
The doctrine of res judicata did not bar plaintiff's right to sue for return of its $11,349 payment in the instant case, where it had failed to include a counterclaim for money damages in a prior lawsuit involving the same transaction, an exchange of two automobiles. New York's permissive counterclaim rule allows counterclaims to be raised through separate litigation even if interposed as a defense in prior litigation, as long as a party defendant does not remain silent in one action, then bring a second suit on the basis of a pre-existing claim for relief that would impair the rights or interests established in the first action (Batavia Kill Watershed Dist. v. Charles O. Desch, Inc., 83 A.D.2d 97, 100, affd 57 N.Y.2d 796; Modell Co. v. Minister of Refm. Prot. Dutch Church, 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461). It does not appear that allowing plaintiff's claim for a money judgment to proceed to disposition on the merits will upset any right or interest of either party.
Concur — Carro, J.P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.