From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 2005
903 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

holding that Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review that became final prior to issuance of that decision

Summary of this case from Langford v. State

Opinion

No. 3D04-3223.

June 8, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judge.

Robbie Clark, Jr., in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's denial of the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion made pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), because Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review that became final prior to issuance of that decision. See Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); McBride v. State, 884 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).


Summaries of

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 2005
903 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

holding that Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review that became final prior to issuance of that decision

Summary of this case from Langford v. State
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robbie CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 8, 2005

Citations

903 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Langford v. State

However, the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, along with the Second, Third, and Fourth…

Fernandez v. State

Because Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review that became final prior to…