From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Riddle

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
118 N.C. 692 (N.C. 1896)

Opinion

(February Term, 1896.)

DISCRETIONARY POWER OF SUPREME COURT — NEW TRIAL — NEWLY DISCOVERED TESTIMONY.

In the discretion of this Court, a motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered testimony will be granted.

ACTION tried at Fall Term, 1895, of MITCHELL, before Bryan, J., and a jury.

J. W. Bowman and Battle Mordecai for defendant.

No counsel contra.


The defendant appealed from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and in this Court moved that a new trial be ordered for newly discovered testimony.


In the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the Court it is ordered that a new trial be granted on account of newly discovered evidence. Such orders are made in this Court, as in the court below, for no other reason than that we think the ends of justice will be best subserved by taking that course, and are never, therefore, to be treated as precedents. Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N.C. 712; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N.C. 347.

New Trial.

Cited: Nathan v. R. R., post, 1070; Herndon v. R. R., 121 N.C. 499; Chrisco v. Yow, 153 N.C. 436. (693)


Summaries of

Clark v. Riddle

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
118 N.C. 692 (N.C. 1896)
Case details for

Clark v. Riddle

Case Details

Full title:J. D. CLARK v. J. A. RIDDLE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1896

Citations

118 N.C. 692 (N.C. 1896)
24 S.E. 492

Citing Cases

State v. City Club

There is authority for such position, and we are disposed to take this view as a general rule. 17 Enc. Law,…

Sledge v. Elliott

For the reasons given the judgment must be Affirmed. Cited: Clark v. Riddle, 118 N.C. 692; Nathan v. R. R.,…