Summary
reasoning that an integration clause in a property agreement which did not delineate the parties' obligations with respect to support for a child did not bar enforcement of a separate agreement addressing the support issue
Summary of this case from Dorsey v. Northern Life Insurance Co.Opinion
No. 41798-3-I.
March 1, 1999. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-2-13137-7, William L. Downing, J., entered November 5, 1997.
Reversed by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Agid, A.C.J., and Coleman, J.