From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Bond Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1973
41 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Summary

In Clark, the Appellate Division, First Department, relied upon the presumption of concurrent jurisdiction, and in a memorandum opinion sustained jurisdiction in State court.

Summary of this case from Brody v. Leamy

Opinion

February 15, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 3, 1972, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, and paragraph "Ninth" of the complaint reinstated. Appellant shall recover of the respondents $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The paragraph stricken seeks recovery under section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code. Since jurisdiction over suits brought under said section has not been restricted to Federal courts, an action thereunder may also be maintained in a State court. ( Grubb v. Public Utilities Comm., 281 U.S. 470.)

Concur — McGivern, J.P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Murphy, JJ.


Summaries of

Clark v. Bond Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1973
41 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

In Clark, the Appellate Division, First Department, relied upon the presumption of concurrent jurisdiction, and in a memorandum opinion sustained jurisdiction in State court.

Summary of this case from Brody v. Leamy
Case details for

Clark v. Bond Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRED CLARK, Appellant, v. BOND STORES, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Young v. Toia

" Prior to the 1976 amendment of section 1988 it was held that State courts have concurrent jurisdiction with…

Shapiro v. Columbia Un. Nat. Bk. Tr. Co.

Three decisions by cogent implication hold that the § 1983 remedy is available in the state court: Jones v.…