From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clanton v. Harris County

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 6, 1990
893 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2232.

February 6, 1990.

James T. Oitzinger, Gerald M. Birnberg, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Roderick Q. Lawrence, Asst. County Atty., Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.


Gregory Scott Clanton appeals the district court's 12(b)(6) dismissal of his § 1983 claim against Harris County. He sued Harris County for damages arising from State District Judge Albert Pruett's alleged failure to appoint counsel to defend him from drug charges in timely fashion. A panel of this court recently concluded that Texas district judges act for the state in appointing counsel for indigent criminal defendants, and the court is not responsible under § 1983 for their actions in this regard. Hamill v. Wright, 870 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir. 1989). We affirm on that basis. See also Clark v. Tarrant County, 798 F.2d 736, 744 (5th Cir. 1986) (Texas district judges "are undeniably state elected officials"); Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 605, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1980).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Clanton v. Harris County

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 6, 1990
893 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1990)
Case details for

Clanton v. Harris County

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY SCOTT CLANTON, ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 1990

Citations

893 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Tarrant County, Texas

Furthermore, "Texas district judges act for the state in appointing counsel for indigent criminal defendants,…

Davis v. Tarrant County

We have held that under Texas law, "[a] local judge acting in his or her judicial capacity is not considered…