From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaintiff v. Blauser

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2427 LKK EFB P.

September 29, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 31, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. After an extension of time, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Concurrently with his objections, plaintiff filed a second request for an extension of time. As his objections were timely filed, that request is denied as unnecessary.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (Dkt. No. 22) filed August 31, 2011, are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff's September 26, 2011 request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 27) is DENIED as moot;

3. Plaintiff's July 14, 2011 motions to appoint counsel and for removal from state custody to federal (Dkt. No. 20) are DENIED. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED for the reasons stated in the findings and recommendations. The motion for removal is DENIED for the reasons stated in the findings and recommendations regarding the request for a preliminary injunction.

4. Plaintiff's motions for temporary restraining order and for preliminary injunction (Dkt. Nos. 2 and 21) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Plaintiff v. Blauser

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Plaintiff v. Blauser

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. BLAUSER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)

Citing Cases

Whatley v. Valdovinos

"The fact that plaintiff has met the pleading requirements allowing him to proceed with the complaint does…

Smith v. Allison

, report and recommendation adopted, No. CIV S-10-2427 LKK, 2011 WL 4765000 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 29, …