From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of St. Louis v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Sep 16, 1986
716 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 50926.

September 16, 1986.

APPEAL FROM CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT COURT, ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JUDGE.

Clair D. Foster, pro se.

John J. Morton, William R. Werner, Jennifer H. Fisher, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.


ORDER


Defendant, who was convicted of municipal ordinance violations, appeals from an order dismissing his applications for trial de novo in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

City of St. Louis v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Sep 16, 1986
716 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

City of St. Louis v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ST. LOUIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. CLAIR D. FOSTER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Sep 16, 1986

Citations

716 S.W.2d 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Seward

The most extreme views regarding the sanctity of the Sabbath never objected to the porformance of necessary…

The Parker-Washington Co. v. Field

[Porter v. Boyd Paving and Construction Co., 214 Mo. 1, 14.] We do not think the ordinance was rendered void,…