From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Spokane v. Spokane Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 8, 2017
390 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93788-5

03-08-2017

CITY OF SPOKANE, Petitioner, v. SPOKANE COUNTY, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 7, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is granted. Review is also granted of the mandamus issues raised by Respondent Spokane County in its answer to the petition for review. Respondent Department of Revenue's motion to strike the City of Spokane's consolidated reply is granted only to the extent that the issue statements numbered II (1) and (2) on page two and sections III(A) and (B) of the argument are stricken from the reply. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

City of Spokane v. Spokane Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 8, 2017
390 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

City of Spokane v. Spokane Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF SPOKANE, Petitioner, v. SPOKANE COUNTY, et al., Respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 8, 2017

Citations

390 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2017)
187 Wash. 2d 1017
187 Wn. 2d 1017