considering a similar ordinance regulating adult entertainment, and concluding that "[t]he district court did not err in holding that such regulation of female breasts is substantially related to the City's interest in regulation"
Summary of this case from Buzzetti v. City of New YorkNo. 87-1754.
February 27, 1989.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 836 F. 2d 1034.
considering a similar ordinance regulating adult entertainment, and concluding that "[t]he district court did not err in holding that such regulation of female breasts is substantially related to the City's interest in regulation"
Summary of this case from Buzzetti v. City of New YorkFull title:CITY OF SOUTH BEND ET AL. v. JANOWIAK
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 27, 1989
Plaintiffs assert that these statistics are based upon an overbroad labor pool, since not all patrol officers…
1995 Venture I, Inc. v. Orange County TexasDefendant has the burden to prove that its ordinance is a valid time, place, and manner regulation. SDJ, Inc.…