In Seattle v. Walker, 87 Wn. 609, 152 P. 330, the city had paid interest on local improvement district bonds for the period between the date of the bonds and their delivery to the contractor.
Summary of this case from Halver v. WelleNo. 33024-1-I.
October 4, 1993. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-1-01773-8, Norma Smith Huggins, J., entered June 7, 1993.
Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
In Seattle v. Walker, 87 Wn. 609, 152 P. 330, the city had paid interest on local improvement district bonds for the period between the date of the bonds and their delivery to the contractor.
Summary of this case from Halver v. WelleFull title:THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. TONY WALKER, Petitioner
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Date published: Oct 4, 1993
" In Seattle v. Walker, 87 Wn. 609, 152 P. 330, the city had paid interest on local improvement district…
Shepherd v. DouganAs to such an action, the statute begins to run on a claim for instalments paid on the purchase price of real…