From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Long Beach v. Bozek

Supreme Court of California
Apr 25, 1983
33 Cal.3d 727 (Cal. 1983)

Summary

holding that the right to petition insulates private litigants from retaliatory malicious prosecution actions by the government

Summary of this case from DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 31448.

April 25, 1983.


MEMORANDUM CASE

OPINION

THE COURT.

On January 10, 1983, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in this case and ordered that "The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California to consider whether its judgment is based upon federal or state constitutional grounds, or both." (___ U.S. ___ [74 L.Ed.2d 943, 103 S.Ct. 712].)

Pursuant to this mandate, the remittitur is recalled. We have reexamined our decision in this case (reported at 31 Cal.3d 527 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 86, 645 P.2d 137]), and certify that our judgment is based on both the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 3, of the California Constitution; accordingly, the latter provision furnishes an independent ground to support the decision. Because we deem it unnecessary to modify our prior opinion, we reiterate that opinion in its entirety.

Let the remittitur issue forthwith.


Summaries of

City of Long Beach v. Bozek

Supreme Court of California
Apr 25, 1983
33 Cal.3d 727 (Cal. 1983)

holding that the right to petition insulates private litigants from retaliatory malicious prosecution actions by the government

Summary of this case from DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.

filing suit against the government is absolutely privileged form of petitioning and therefore government may not bring malicious prosecution action against unsuccessful plaintiff

Summary of this case from Doe v. Alaska Superior Ct., Third Jud. Dist

In Bozek, the Supreme Court held that governmental entities may not bring malicious prosecution actions against those who have previously sued them without success, but noted public entities may nonetheless have a substantial interest in recovering all expenses incurred in defending the lawsuit.

Summary of this case from Curtis v. County of Los Angeles
Case details for

City of Long Beach v. Bozek

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF LONG BEACH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICHARD BOZEK, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 25, 1983

Citations

33 Cal.3d 727 (Cal. 1983)
190 Cal. Rptr. 918
661 P.2d 1072

Citing Cases

Pacific Gas Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns Co.

"The right of petition, like the other rights contained in the First Amendment and in the California…

Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo Bank

The former invokes the judicial power of government to redress a wrong committed by another, the latter is a…