From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Long Beach v. Anderson

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 6, 1934
139 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 5101.

June 6, 1934.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to retax costs. Guy F. Bush, Judge. Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Nowland M. Reid, City Attorney, and Edmund J. Callaway, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.

Louis N. Whealton and Raymond J. Kirkpatrick for Respondents.


MEMORANDUM CASE.


[1] This is an appeal from an order refusing to retax costs. The facts are exactly the same as those which were involved in the case of City of Long Beach, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. May E. Anderson et al., Defendants; Edison Securities Company, a Corporation, Respondent (Civil No. 5092), ante, p. 130 [ 33 P.2d 875], in which an opinion of this court was this day filed, except that the expert witness fees which were allowed in this case amounted to the sum of $95.80.

Upon the authority of that case, the order in this case is reversed, with direction to the court to retax costs in accordance therewith.

Pullen, P.J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 2, 1934.


Summaries of

City of Long Beach v. Anderson

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 6, 1934
139 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

City of Long Beach v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF LONG BEACH (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. MAY E…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Jun 6, 1934

Citations

139 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
33 P.2d 876

Citing Cases

Metropolitan Water Dist. v. Adams

In the absence of an order of appointment, the statute expressly provides, only the statutory fees shall be…