Summary
In City of Knoxville v. Southern Ry. Co., 149 Tenn. 291, 258 S.W. 143, the question as to whether the city of Knoxville, under general charter powers, had authority to require the railway company to build and maintain a viaduct over a crossing, was specially reserved.
Summary of this case from City of Memphis v. Southern Ry. Co.Opinion
No. 4231.
June 30, 1926.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Zenophon Hicks, Judge.
Fowler Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff in error.
L.D. Smith, of Knoxville, Tenn., S.R. Prince, of Washington, D.C., and J.B. Wright, of Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant in error.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.