From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Gretna v. Defense Plant Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 15, 1947
159 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 11777.

February 15, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Wayne G. Borah, Judge.

Action by the City of Gretna against Defense Plant Corporation to recover the value of piling erected by city in the Mississippi river and alleged to have been destroyed by a tug belonging to defendant. Summary judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Andrew H. Thalheim, of Gretna, La., for appellant, Jos. M. Rault, Walter Carroll, and Alfred M. Farrell, Jr., all of New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.


The City of Gretna appeals from a summary judgment against it in its suit against the Defense Plant Corporation, wherein it sought recovery for the destruction of piling erected by it in the Mississippi River, alleged to have been destroyed by a tug of the defendant that collided with the piling.

On a motion for summary judgment, it appeared that the appellee owned twenty-one tugs at the time of the collision, one of which did the damage, but the appellant was unable to identify the particular tug. It further appeared by affidavit, and was undisputed, that eighteen of the tugs owned by the appellee had been chartered to private operators, and that the appellee had no control over their management or navigation. The remaining three tugs were accounted for at the time in question, and each was shown to be not the vessel that did the damage.

It is contended that the defendant, under Admiralty Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, should have impleaded the charterers of its vessels, which were operating on the river at the time, but this is a civil action and the Admiralty Rules have no application. Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, gave the defendant the right to implead its charterers, but did not require it to do so. The right to bring in third parties is permissive, not obligatory.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.


Summaries of

City of Gretna v. Defense Plant Corporation

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 15, 1947
159 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1947)
Case details for

City of Gretna v. Defense Plant Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF GRETNA v. DEFENSE PLANT CORPORATION

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 1947

Citations

159 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Pierce v. Fondren Orthopedic Grp., LLP

Rule 14(a) does not compel a defendant to bring third parties into an action; it simply permits the addition…

North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DAV Corp.

DAV further contends it is entitled to a jury trial on its cross-claims and third party claims. Generally,…