From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Farmers Branch v. American Honda Motor

Supreme Court of Texas
May 5, 1976
537 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1976)

Opinion

No. B — 5550.

May 5, 1976.

Durant, Mankoff, Davis Wolens, Ronald M. Mankoff, Dallas, for petitioners.

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman, Johnson Blumenthal, Marvin S. Sloman and Peter Tierney, Dallas, for respondent.


This is a companion case to our Cause Number B — 5551, City of Farmers Branch v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America, decided this day. 537 S.W.2d 452. The cases were submitted and argued together in this court.

The Honda warehouse in Farmers Branch stores parts and accessories for Honda automobiles, motorcycles, and outboard motors. The parts and accessories were imported from Japan in sealed sea vans. As in Matsushita, Farmers Branch assessed ad valorem personal property taxes on these items for the year 1972. Honda declined to pay the tax and brought this suit for a declaratory judgment that the merchandise was tax-exempt under the import-export clause, Section 10 of Article I of the United States Constitution.

The questions are the same as those presented in Matsushita, and the disposition of those questions in Matsushita control the disposition of this cause.

The judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals, 527 S.W.2d 776, are reversed; the injunction entered by the trial court against the assessment and collection of the taxes is dissolved; and judgment is here rendered that Honda is subject to the nondiscriminatory ad valorem taxes assessed by Farmers Branch.


Summaries of

City of Farmers Branch v. American Honda Motor

Supreme Court of Texas
May 5, 1976
537 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1976)
Case details for

City of Farmers Branch v. American Honda Motor

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: May 5, 1976

Citations

537 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1976)

Citing Cases

Schettler v. County of Santa Clara

To begin with, it is entirely clear that the United States Supreme Court has failed to rule on the question…

Harris Cty v. Xerox Corp.

However, in that year the United States Supreme Court in Michelin Tire Corporation v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276, 96…