From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Buffalo v. Murry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1981
79 A.D.2d 1096 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

January 23, 1981

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff's complaint alleges that two Buffalo policemen were injured in a motor vehicle accident involving defendant and that since the officers were on duty at the time, the city was required, pursuant to section 207-c Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, to pay medical and hospital expenses and wages. Plaintiff seeks a judgment from defendant for reimbursement of these expenses totaling $3,329.76. Defendant moved for summary judgment contending that the action for medical expenses and lost wages is barred by subdivision 1 of section 673 Ins. of the Insurance Law. That statute provides in part: "in any action by or on behalf of a covered person * * * for personal injuries arising out of negligence in the use or operation of a motor vehicle, in this state, there shall be no right of recovery for * * * basic economic loss." The definition of basic economic loss includes medical expenses and lost wages. The city contends that notwithstanding the provision of the Insurance Law it is entitled to reimbursement because of the following portions of subdivision 6 of section 207-c Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law: "Notwithstanding any provision of law contrary thereto contained herein or elsewhere, a cause of action shall accrue to the municipality for reimbursement in such sum or sums actually paid as salary or wages and or for medical treatment and hospital care as against any third party against whom the policeman shall have a cause of action for the injury sustained or sickness caused by such third party." The right of recovery granted to municipalities in 1961 by subdivision 6 of section 207-c is now limited by the subsequently enacted no-fault law (Insurance Law, § 670 et seq.). The police officers are covered persons (see Insurance Law, § 671, subd 10; Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 321, subd 2; and see Joyce v. Winkler, 71 A.D.2d 28), and as covered persons, they could not maintain an action for basic economic loss (Insurance Law, § 673, subd 1). The city's right to recover under the General Municipal Law is derivative (see City of Buffalo v Maggio, 21 N.Y.2d 1017), and since the no-fault law bars the policemen's action, it also bars the city's action.


Summaries of

City of Buffalo v. Murry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1981
79 A.D.2d 1096 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

City of Buffalo v. Murry

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BUFFALO, Appellant, v. WALLACE E. MURRY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1981

Citations

79 A.D.2d 1096 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Weiner v. City of N.Y

"[n]otwithstanding any other law, in any action by or on behalf of a covered person against another covered…

Village of Suffern v. Baels

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, without prejudice to the plaintiff, if it be so advised,…