From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Beaumont v. Jackson

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 6, 2014
NO. 09-14-00412-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00412-CV

11-06-2014

THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, Appellant v. JUSTIN JACKSON, Appellee


On Appeal from the 60th District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. B-192,252

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The City of Beaumont filed a notice of accelerated appeal. The appellee, Justin Jackson, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court has not signed a written order denying the City's plea to the jurisdiction. In its response, the City argues that the trial court implicitly denied the City's plea by not dismissing the case and that the City is entitled to appeal the trial court's refusal to rule on the plea.

The time for filing an accelerated appeal runs from the date on which the appealable order is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). An appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal authorized by section 51.014(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code unless the trial court signed a written order. See Reyes v. Burrus, No. 08-14-00080-CV, 2014 WL 2013404, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso May 14, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.); State v. Nine Hundred Eighty-Two Thousand One Hundred Ten Dollars, No. 08-11-00253-CV, 2011 WL 4068011, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso Sept. 14, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re Nationwide Credit, Inc., No. 13-10-00007-CV, 2010 WL 596809, at *4 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Feb. 18, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); Hubbard-Jowers v. Starfire Enters., Ltd., No. 02-06-462-CV, 2007 WL 439052, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 8, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8) (West Supp. 2014). "The appellate timetable does not commence to run other than by signed, written order, even when the signing of such order is purely ministerial." Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995).

We lack jurisdiction because the trial court has not signed an appealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Submitted on November 5, 2014
Opinion Delivered November 6, 2014
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

City of Beaumont v. Jackson

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 6, 2014
NO. 09-14-00412-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2014)
Case details for

City of Beaumont v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, Appellant v. JUSTIN JACKSON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 6, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-14-00412-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Morgan v. Johnson-Todd

Generally, the appellate timetable does not commence to run other than by a signed written order. See City of…

Clark v. Paddington British Private Sch., Inc.

See KTRK Television, Inc., 409 S.W.3d at 688 (holding that "section 27.008 permits an interlocutory appeal…