From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Austin v. Pulliam

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 6, 2018
NO. 03-18-00306-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2018)

Summary

granting City's unopposed motion to dismiss its interlocutory appeal from trial court's order denying its amended plea to jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Borgelt v. Austin Firefighters Ass'n

Opinion

NO. 03-18-00306-CV

07-06-2018

City of Austin, Texas, and Spencer Cronk, in his Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Austin, Appellants v. Mark Pulliam, Jay Wiley, and the State of Texas, Appellees


FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. D-1-GN-16-004307 , THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants City of Austin, Texas, and Spencer Cronk, in his Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Austin, have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant appellants' motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

This suit was originally brought against Marc A. Ott, the former City Manager of the City of Austin. We automatically substitute the name of the successor to this office, Spencer Cronk. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2.

/s/_________

Scott K. Field, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field Dismissed on Appellants' Motion Filed: July 6, 2018


Summaries of

City of Austin v. Pulliam

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 6, 2018
NO. 03-18-00306-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2018)

granting City's unopposed motion to dismiss its interlocutory appeal from trial court's order denying its amended plea to jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Borgelt v. Austin Firefighters Ass'n
Case details for

City of Austin v. Pulliam

Case Details

Full title:City of Austin, Texas, and Spencer Cronk, in his Official Capacity as City…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

NO. 03-18-00306-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2018)

Citing Cases

Borgelt v. Austin Firefighters Ass'n

(mem. op.) (concluding that trial court did not rule on Association's TCPA motion to dismiss with respect to…