From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarter

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 286 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted May 26th, 1933.

Decided September 27th, 1933.

Depletion of oil wells should not be deducted from income in ascertaining what part of dividends received from a corporation are apportionable to income and what part to corpus.

On appeal from the court of chancery.

Messrs. Lindabury, Depue Faulks ( Mr. Josiah Stryker, of counsel), for the complainant-respondent.

Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn Colyer, Mr. George W. Grimm, Jr., and Mr. Ralph E. Lum, for the guardian ad litem for Ann Cooper Hewitt, Maryon McCarter and Peder S. Bruguiere, Jr.

Messrs. Whiting Moore ( Mr. Ira C. Moore, Jr., of counsel), for Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.


There are two appeals. The appeal of Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art is from so much of the decree as determines that the complainant, in ascertaining what part of the dividends received from Union Sulphur Company during the years 1931 and 1932 are apportionable to income, should not deduct from the annual profits of such company for such years any amounts charged off during said period for oil depletion by said company, and also from so much of the decree as declares that of the sum of $22,000 representing the distributions made to the complainant during the years 1930 and 1931 on the stock of Union Sulphur Company held by it, $10,014 be apportioned to income. The appeal of Maryon McCarter, Peder S. Brugiere, Jr., and Ann Cooper Hewitt is from that portion of the decree that orders taxed costs and counsel fees be paid in part from income and in part from corpus rather than exclusively from corpus.

The decree below was advised by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow who filed an opinion that is reported in 111 N.J. Eq. 315. For the reasons there given (except those bearing on the effect of decrees in the orphans court on intermediate accountings, a subject not now before us) we affirm on the main appeal. Upon this disposition of the merits we think that the apportionment of the taxed costs and counsel fees was equitable.

The decree below will be affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarter

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 286 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McCarter

Case Details

Full title:CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY, formerly the Farmers Loan and Trust…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1933

Citations

168 A. 286 (N.J. 1933)
168 A. 286

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Errion

The defendants failed to apportion it between the life tenants and the remaindermen. See Lang v.…