From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens Southern National Bank v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 10, 1975
214 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50276.

SUBMITTED MARCH 3, 1975.

DECIDED MARCH 10, 1975.

Appellate procedure. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Oliver.

Adams, Adams, Brennan Gardner, M. Lane Morrison, Jack E. Miller, for appellants.

John M. Tatum, for appellees.


Miller, Beckmann Simpson, a partnership law firm, brought suit against The Citizens Southern National Bank and Joseph C. Saffold, co-executors under the will of Thomas P. Saffold, seeking to recover for legal services rendered the estate. The trial court granted summary judgment to plaintiffs in the total amount of $24,423.11, and the executors filed their notice of appeal from this judgment. Various disputes arose or continued between the co-executors and, subsequent to the case being docketed in this court, a hearing was held in the probate court resulting in an order, inter alia, that "the executors shall borrow an amount sufficient to satisfy the claim of Miller, Beckmann and Simpson up to $17,500." Pursuant to this order, the money was borrowed and paid to the law firm and the present case has been marked "settled, satisfied and dismissed" in the court below.

Under the circumstances this appeal must be dismissed as moot in accordance with the motion to dismiss filed by the co-executor bank. If co-executor Saffold has further quarrel with the other executor, the law firm, or the order of the probate court, those matters must be pursued in other proceedings since the instant dispute has been concluded.

Appeal dismissed. Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

SUBMITTED MARCH 3, 1975 — DECIDED MARCH 10, 1975.


Summaries of

Citizens Southern National Bank v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 10, 1975
214 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Citizens Southern National Bank v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK et al. v. MILLER et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 10, 1975

Citations

214 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
214 S.E.2d 9

Citing Cases

Grizzard v. Petkas

The remaining enumerations of error are moot, as the plaintiff's suit was dismissed prior to the first appeal…

Richardson v. Phillips

Black's Law Dictionary 1008 (6th ed.1990). See Nat. Bank v. Miller,Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Cravey,…