From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens Savings Bank v. Milo Equities, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 20, 2001.

October 15, 2001.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Leonard Horwitz and Marjorie Horwitz appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated May 16, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion for a deficiency judgment.

Jeffrey Rovins, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

McCabe Mack, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Richard R. DuVall and Christina M. Bookless of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment (see, RPAPL 1371). The equitable considerations raised by the appellants do not warrant a modification of the deficiency judgment (see, Trustco Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Sack, 270 A.D.2d 252; cf., Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Avalon Orchards, 118 A.D.2d 297).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SMITH and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citizens Savings Bank v. Milo Equities, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Citizens Savings Bank v. Milo Equities, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS SAVINGS BANK, respondent, v. MILO EQUITIES, LTD., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 642