From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank v. Sahakian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1996
225 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 7, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John DiNoto, J.).


Although time was not made of the essence, the referee of sale found appellant in default for failure to close. The terms of sale, which a principal of appellant signed, and to which it was, therefore, bound, granted the referee discretion to grant an adjournment of the closing, which it did on one occasion, and to direct a new foreclosure sale in the event of noncompliance with the terms of sale. The terms of sale also provided for the forfeiture of appellant's down payment upon default.

We have considered appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Citibank v. Sahakian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1996
225 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Citibank v. Sahakian

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. RIMA SAHAKIAN et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Brien v. Spitzer

( Matter of Garcia v Abrams, 98 AD2d 871; Matter of LoRusso v New York State Off. of Ct. Admin., 229 AD2d…