From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank v. Colucci

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jun 29, 2018
60 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

2017-1480 RI C

06-29-2018

CITIBANK, N.A., Appellant, v. Valerie COLUCCI, et al., Occupants, and Thomas Colucci, Respondent.

Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP (Stuart L. Kossar of counsel), for appellant. Staten Island Legal Services (Jeanette Cepeda and Logan Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP (Stuart L. Kossar of counsel), for appellant.

Staten Island Legal Services (Jeanette Cepeda and Logan Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, J.P., MICHAEL L. PESCE, MICHELLE WESTON, JJ

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and the motion by occupant Thomas Colucci to dismiss so much of the petition as is against him is denied.

Petitioner purchased the premises at a sale held pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure that had been entered in an action in the Supreme Court, Richmond County. All of the occupants were subsequently served, by conspicuous-place service, with 10-day notices to vacate and attorney-certified copies of the referee's deed. After petitioner commenced this summary proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (5), Thomas Colucci (occupant) moved to dismiss so much of the petition as is against him on the ground that affixing the deed to the door of the premises did not satisfy the exhibition requirement of RPAPL 713 (5), citing this court's decision in Home Loan Servs., Inc. v. Moskowitz (31 Misc 3d 37 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dits 2011] ). The Civil Court granted occupant's motion.

This court has recently held that service of a certified copy of a deed by means other than personal delivery satisfies the exhibition requirement of RPAPL 713 (5) and no longer adheres to the decision in Home Loan Servs., Inc. v. Moskowitz (see Plotch v. Dellis , ––– Misc 3d ––––, 2018 NY Slip Op 28116 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018] ). Accordingly, the order is reversed and occupant's motion is denied.

ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and WESTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citibank v. Colucci

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jun 29, 2018
60 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

Citibank v. Colucci

Case Details

Full title:Citibank, N.A., Appellant, v. Valerie Colucci, et al., Occupants, and…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jun 29, 2018

Citations

60 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 51064
110 N.Y.S.3d 202

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Tr. v. Hayes

In this post-foreclosure summary proceeding, the requirement of RPAPL 713 (5) that the deed delivered…

U.S. Bank Tr. v. Emdin

As Petitioner notes in its opposition, the in-hand service requirement for a referee's deed was abrogated by…