From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cineas v. Strange

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 15, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv572-WHA (M.D. Ala. Jun. 15, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv572-WHA

06-15-2015

JOHN PIERRE CINEAS, Petitioner, v. LUTHER STRANGE, Respondent.


ORDER AND OPINION

On May 19, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 28). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE this 15th day of June, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cineas v. Strange

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 15, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv572-WHA (M.D. Ala. Jun. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Cineas v. Strange

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PIERRE CINEAS, Petitioner, v. LUTHER STRANGE, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv572-WHA (M.D. Ala. Jun. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

Quiroga v. Clarke

As soon as he was found guilty by the jury, Quiroga was subject to mandatory deportation, and thus, any…

Mcdaniel v. Toby

See Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 331-32 (2007) (“[A] state postconviction application remains pending…