From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cimino v. Town of Hempstead

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 709 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided October 17, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Eli Wager, J.

Stanley M. Goldberg for appellants.

Frank L. Amoroso and Edward J. Hart for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 110 A.D.2d 805).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.


Summaries of

Cimino v. Town of Hempstead

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 709 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Cimino v. Town of Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CIMINO et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1985

Citations

66 N.Y.2d 709 (N.Y. 1985)
496 N.Y.S.2d 425
487 N.E.2d 282

Citing Cases

Mesick v. State

The city was found not to be negligent because its failure to provide supervision or construct a locked fence…

Weese v. State of New York

Further, both parties agree that the hazard was open and obvious and known to Jeremy at the time of his…