From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cicerella Unempl. Comp. Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 21, 1958
137 A.2d 853 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)

Opinion

November 12, 1957.

January 21, 1958.

Unemployment compensation — Suitable employment — Refusal because of lower wage — Reasonable time for obtaining work at former salary — Evidence — Unemployment Compensation Law.

1. A claimant who seeks benefits must at all times be ready and willing to accept suitable employment and must have substantially reasonable grounds for refusing the offered work.

2. A claimant cannot be permitted an indefinite time to decline suitable employment on the ground that the salary offered is lower than that received in her previous employment but is entitled only to a reasonable opportunity to obtain work at the same salary.

3. Where it appeared that claimant had been employed as a secretary for years and was earning approximately $333 a month at the time she was laid off; that approximately three months later she was referred to a secretarial position, with a salary of $250 a month, which she refused because she felt that the salary offered was too low; and that the referral job paid the prevailing rate for secretarial work in the area; it was Held, in the circumstances, that the board properly Held that claimant was ineligible for benefits under § 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, and WATKINS, JJ.

Appeal, No. 203, April T., 1957, from decision of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, July 31, 1957, Decision No. B-44409, in re claim of Stella M. Cicerella. Decision affirmed.

Stella M. Cicerella, appellant, in propria persona.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, for appellee.


Submitted November 12, 1957.


This is an unemployment compensation case in which the claimant, Stella M. Cicerella, was denied benefits by the bureau. On appeal the referee reversed the bureau and allowed the claim. The Board of Review, upon further appeal, reversed the referee and reinstated the bureau's decision denying benefits. The decision of the Board of Review was based on § 402a of the Unemployment Compensation Law, which provides that "An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week — (a) In which his unemployment is due to failure, without good cause, . . . to accept suitable work when offered to him by the employment office. . . ." Claimant has appealed from the board's decision.

The claimant was last employed as a secretary by the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Pittsburgh. She had been employed by this company for 31 years and was earning approximately $333.00 a month at the time she was laid off. Her last day of work was November 9, 1956, on which date the employer moved its office to Fort Wayne, Indiana. On February 7, 1957, approximately three months later, the claimant was referred by the employment service to a secretarial position with Methods Engineering, Pittsburgh, at a salary of $250.00 a month. The board found that "Claimant refused to accept this referral because she felt that the salary offered was too low." There is adequate evidence in the record to substantiate this finding. A claimant who seeks benefits must at all times be ready and willing to accept suitable employment and must have substantially reasonable grounds for refusing the offered work. Haug Unemployment Compensation Case, 162 Pa. Super. 1, 56 A.2d 396; Wolovich Unemployment Compensation Case, 169 Pa. Super. 356, 82 A.2d 64; Boyland Unemployment Compensation Case, 174 Pa. Super. 164, 100 A.2d 129; Sweeney Unemployment Compensation Case, 177 Pa. Super. 243, 110 A.2d 843; Pompa Unemployment Compensation Case, 179 Pa. Super. 443, 115 A.2d 772; Reed Unemployment Compensation Case, 182 Pa. Super. 428, 128 A.2d 112; Nygren Unemployment Compensation Case, 184 Pa. Super. 138, 132 A.2d 727. Despite the fact the salary offered was lower than that received in her previous employment, the claimant had been unemployed for approximately three months and she cannot be permitted an indefinite time to decline work on that ground but is entitled only to a reasonable opportunity to obtain work at the same salary. Misinkaitis Unemployment Compensation Case, 169 Pa. Super. 124, 82 A.2d 74.

Suitable work is defined in § 4(t) of the Law, 43 P. S. § 753 (t). The matters to be considered in determining what is suitable work have been fully stated so often and so recently that there is no need to repeat them here. Claimant had performed the duties of a secretary for a period of 31 years and therefore the job offered was one within her capabilities. Although there was a substantial reduction in wages, the referral job paid the prevailing rate for secretarial work in that area and it cannot be considered unsuitable because of the reduction alone. The claimant has not advanced any good reason for her failure to accept the referral to suitable work.

Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Cicerella Unempl. Comp. Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 21, 1958
137 A.2d 853 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)
Case details for

Cicerella Unempl. Comp. Case

Case Details

Full title:Cicerella Unemployment Compensation Case

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 21, 1958

Citations

137 A.2d 853 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)
137 A.2d 853

Citing Cases

Sanft Unempl. Compensation Case

Five months of unemployment is not an unreasonable period of time for a person to seek the type of employment…

Prystash Unempl. Compensation Case

Under all the circumstances of this case, the board was justified in denying her further compensation on the…