From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.

Supreme Court of California
Nov 4, 1891
91 Cal. 592 (Cal. 1891)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL

          Smith & Murasky, and James F. Smith, for Appellants.

          Charles S. Wheeler, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT          This is an appeal from the judgment, and the case comes before us on the judgment roll alone.

         The complaint states a cause of action. We have to presume, in the absence of findings, that they were waived, there being nothing in [28 P. 45] the record to show affirmatively that they were not waived, and the judgment does not grant any relief in excess of that which was demanded in the complaint.

         The judgment is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.

Supreme Court of California
Nov 4, 1891
91 Cal. 592 (Cal. 1891)
Case details for

Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEE CHUCK, Respondent, v. QUAN WO CHONG&CO., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 4, 1891

Citations

91 Cal. 592 (Cal. 1891)
28 P. 44

Citing Cases

Verdier v. Verdier

Here we learn from plaintiffs' testimony and stipulations that they did commit the offense charged. [1] A…

Liberato v. Asuncion

It has long been held that a cotenant has no right to oust a person who holds possession with the consent of…