From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chongt Yang v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0212 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0212 KJM AC P

02-12-2013

CHONGT YANG, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Respondent.


ORDER

On December 28, 2012, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 27), recommending denial of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It has come to the court's attention that petitioner submitted a notice of change of address which was filed in this court on January 4, 2013. Although the case docket does not show that petitioner's copy of the findings and recommendations has been returned, it appears unlikely that petitioner received the document.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Along with this order, the Clerk of the Court shall re-serve upon petitioner at his current address of record the findings and recommendations filed on December 28, 2012 (ECF No. 27); and

2. Petitioner is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations.

________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Chongt Yang v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0212 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Chongt Yang v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:CHONGT YANG, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0212 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Chongt Yang v. McDonald

Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial by finding that…