Opinion
AC 37136
12-08-2015
ROBERT CHIULLI, JR. v. CHRIS CHIULLI ET AL.
George W. Kramer, for the appellant (plaintiff). Eric H. Rothauser, with whom, on the brief, was Lee B. Ross, for the appellees (defendants).
Lavine, Alvord and Bishop, Js. (Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, Peck, J.) George W. Kramer, for the appellant (plaintiff). Eric H. Rothauser, with whom, on the brief, was Lee B. Ross, for the appellees (defendants).
Opinion
PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Robert Chiulli, Jr., appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants, Chris Chiulli and his business, Double "C" Construction Company, LLC. The plaintiff claims that (1) the facts do not support the trial court's judgment as to his breach of contract claim, and (2) the court erred in its application of the law in regard to his claims of conversion and statutory theft. We disagree.
Our examination of the record on appeal and the arguments of the parties persuade us that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. Because the trial court's memorandum of decision fully addresses the arguments raised in the present appeal, we adopt its concise and well reasoned decision as a proper statement of the relevant facts and the applicable law concerning the issues raised by the plaintiff. See Chiulli v. Chiulli, 161 Conn. App. 639, A.3d (2014) (appendix). It would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained therein. See Discover Bank v. Hill, 150 Conn. App. 164, 174, 93 A.3d 159, cert. denied, 312 Conn. 924, 94 A.3d 1203 (2014).
The judgment is affirmed.