From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

March, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.


Motion for reargument denied. The following phrase in the opinion "indexing is no part of the record" is incorrect. (Real Property Law, § 316.) The laches of the moving party, however, preclude the granting of a reargument; the reason given for failing to move in accordance with rule 19 being insufficient to warrant this court in disturbing the decision heretofore made.

See 230 App. Div. 410, 414. — [REP.

Amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 582. — [REP.

See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept. rule 19. — [REP.


Summaries of

Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HENRY S. CHITTICK, Appellant, v. THOMPSON HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Camfield v. Luther Forest Corporation

She introduced testimony from a title researcher who stated that a proper search of the county clerk's…