From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Childs v. Childs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1942
263 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

February 27, 1942.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Martin, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


The court at Special Term in dismissing the complaint in effect held that the mistake as pleaded was one of law rather than of fact. With that conclusion we do not agree. Sufficient appears to indicate, for the present at least, that the mistake was one of fact rather than of law. After issue is joined, the court may find that the overpayments were voluntarily made under a mistake of law in which event there could not be a recovery by plaintiff. ( Payne v. Witherbee, Sherman Co., 200 N.Y. 572, 576.) However, it cannot now be determined from the complaint, in advance of a trial, that the mistake was not one of fact.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order.


Order unanimously reversed and motion denied, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof.


Summaries of

Childs v. Childs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1942
263 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Childs v. Childs

Case Details

Full title:HARRY R. CHILDS, Appellant, v. ELIZABETH HEBERT CHILDS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1942

Citations

263 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Hammond v. Hammond

Appellant knew what his income for the year 1938 was, knew what portion of it had been derived from the sale…