From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Aug 26, 1946
156 F.2d 981 (3d Cir. 1946)

Opinion

No. 9066.

Argued June 18, 1946.

Decided August 26, 1946.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware; Paul Leahy, Judge.

William F. Hall, of Washington, D.C. (William S. Potter, of Wilmington, Del., and R.G. Mullee, of New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill. (Robert F. Campbell and Lester B. Clark, both of Houston, Tex., and Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges, and KALODNER, District Judge.


Scrutiny of the briefs and appendices and careful consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error in respect to count 3 of the complaint, the only count before us for consideration. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Leahy, 61 F. Supp. 767, 771, 772.

Judge O'CONNELL participated in the consideration and decision of this case but was unable to collaborate in the preparation of the opinion.


Summaries of

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Aug 26, 1946
156 F.2d 981 (3d Cir. 1946)
Case details for

Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., a Corporation of New Jersey, and Chicago…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 1946

Citations

156 F.2d 981 (3d Cir. 1946)

Citing Cases

Alamo Refining Co. v. Shell Development Co.

gation and a complete failure to allege that either Kellogg or Universal charged plaintiff with infringement…

Research Electronics Devices Co. v. Neptune Meter Co.

The law is sufficiently clear that the mere act of calling a competitor's attention to his alleged…