From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicago N.W. R.W. v. Chicago. Mil., St. Paul

U.S.
Apr 5, 1965
380 U.S. 448 (1965)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN.

No. 21.

Argued November 17, 1964. Decided April 5, 1965.

214 F. Supp. 244, reversed.

John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.

Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.


The judgment is reversed. Texas P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. S. F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278.


Summaries of

Chicago N.W. R.W. v. Chicago. Mil., St. Paul

U.S.
Apr 5, 1965
380 U.S. 448 (1965)
Case details for

Chicago N.W. R.W. v. Chicago. Mil., St. Paul

Case Details

Full title:CHICAGO NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v . CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL PACIFIC…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 5, 1965

Citations

380 U.S. 448 (1965)

Citing Cases

Tampa Phosphate R. v. Seaboard Coast Line R

Under these circumstances no further burial ritual would seem required. Today it is clear, contrary to the…

New Orleans Terminal Company v. Spencer

The Supreme Court reversed "per curiam" citing only "Texas P.R. Co. v. Gulf, C. S.F.R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278…