From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiapella v. County National Bank and Trust Company of Santa Barbara

Supreme Court of California
Mar 7, 1933
217 Cal. 503 (Cal. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 13891.

March 7, 1933.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. A.B. Bigler, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

James Donovan for Appellant.

Griffith Thornburgh for Respondent.


THE COURT.

The lower court dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction.

[1] A suit upon a rejected claim is not an exercise of probate jurisdiction. The action is upon the contract and venue is determined as in other civil cases. ( McLean v. Crow, 88 Cal. 644, 647 [26 P. 596]; Gallagher v. McGraw, 132 Cal. 601 [ 26 P. 596].) Such a suit is also recognized as a transitory action. It follows the person of the defendant and may be tried in a county other than that wherein the estate is being probated. ( Thompson v. Wood, 115 Cal. 301 [ 64 P. 1080].)

The order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Chiapella v. County National Bank and Trust Company of Santa Barbara

Supreme Court of California
Mar 7, 1933
217 Cal. 503 (Cal. 1933)
Case details for

Chiapella v. County National Bank and Trust Company of Santa Barbara

Case Details

Full title:S.E. CHIAPELLA, Appellant, v. COUNTY NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 7, 1933

Citations

217 Cal. 503 (Cal. 1933)
19 P.2d 983

Citing Cases

Vickerson v. Wehr

The motion was contested by appellant, and after a hearing the same was granted. [1] In some states the venue…

Palmer v. Gregg

( Id. at p. 647.) (See also, Chiapella v. County NationalBank etc. Co. (1933) 217 Cal. 503 [ 19 P.2d 983];…