Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner

Full title: CHET'S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIDNEY KASTNER…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

449 F. App'x 37 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Opinion

2010-1555

08-05-2011

CHET'S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIDNEY KASTNER, Defendant-Appellant.

DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee. WALTER D. AMES, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in No. 08-CV-0197, Senior Judge J. Garvan Murtha.

JUDGMENT

DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee.

WALTER D. AMES, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk